Essential Latin for Reformed Christians: "D.V."

For centuries the Church conducted most of its affairs in Latin.  While Latin started off as the vernacular of the Western Church, eventually it became a static, dead language.  Used in the mass, in the Latin Bible (the Vulgate) in the academy and assemblies, common people were in time excluded from knowledgeable participation in church life because they had no knowledge of Latin.  With the Reformation, all that changed.  The Church again began to use the common language of the people in most areas.  Nevertheless, certain Latin terms and expressions continued to be used in sermons and popular books.

In this series, I want to explain some of the most common Latin terms and expressions our Reformed churches continue to use.  I’ll assume everyone is already familiar with the five Latin “solas” of the Reformation, and we’ll move on to some others.  These are terms and expressions you may still hear from the pulpit or in books.  Sometimes they might be explained (I always endeavour to do so), but sometimes not.  They’re all worth knowing.

Today we’re looking at “D.V.”  We’re commonly told this means, “the Lord willing.”  Growing up in a church of Dutch immigrants, I thought “D.V.” must be short for “DeLord Villing.”  But no, it’s actually Latin:  Deo volente.

Deo volente does not actually literally translate to “the Lord willing.”  It literally means, “God willing.”  It’s commonly said to mean “the Lord willing” because of its roots in James 4:15, “…you ought to say, ‘If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that.'”  Older writers used to be a little more elaborate and say “sub conditione Jacobi” (under the condition of James).   Seeing how the expression comes from James, to be more precise “D.V.” ought to be understood as Domino volente (the Lord willing).  However, at the end of the day it all means the same thing, so I for one will not quibble too much about it.

“D.V.” is often attached to plans and announced events in our Reformed churches.  By it, we recognize that we may make our plans, but sometimes God decides otherwise.  As the Holy Spirit says in James 4:14, “yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring.”  But is it necessary to always attach a “D.V.” to every plan and event?  I don’t think it is.  I don’t think James 4:15 requires us to literally say “D.V.” every time we look to something in the future.  James 4 is addressing a heart issue.  In our hearts, we ought to recognize God’s sovereignty over our plans.  And from there, it ought to somehow find expression in the words we speak too.  But I believe it sufficient to say, “We plan to hold this or that event” or “We hope to…” or “An elders meeting is scheduled for Monday evening.”  Saying things in that manner displays the humility envisioned in James 4.  While certainly not wrong to use “D.V.” it can become pious jargon you’re supposed to use, but about which you don’t even really think anymore.  Since it involves God’s Name, that can become dangerous.  Whether you use “D.V.” or not, the attitude is what really matters.

Recent

Video
Partakers of Grace - Phil 1
Paul's affection for the church at Philippi confronts the modern habit of treating the church as a product to consume. The believer's bond to a local congregation rests not on personal preference but on the shared grace of the gospel and the God who finishes what he begins.
Do vs. Done: The Law/Gospel Distinction with Dr. R. Scott Clark
Chris Gordon and Dr. R. Scott Clark respond to a recent critique of law and gospel preaching. They explain what the distinction actually is, where it gets abused, and why abandoning it leaves congregations under the covenant of works.
Whom Shall I Fear?
David's confidence in the Lord is not theory but experience — a life of deliverances read backward. Psalm 27 moves from unshakable joy to raw lament and back to a promise: wait on the Lord, and He will strengthen your heart.
Is Roman Catholicism Right About Tradition? - Part 2
Dr. W. Robert Godfrey joins Pastor Chris Gordon in part 2 of a conversation about "tradition" — from the Bible's own positive use of the word to Rome's claims of an unwritten apostolic deposit — and why every tradition, Protestant or Catholic, must ultimately answer to Scripture.
Where Are the Nine? | Luke 17:11–19 - Lectio Continua
Ten lepers cry out to Jesus for mercy and are all healed — but only one, a Samaritan, turns back to give thanks. Pastor Chris Gordon asks what separates outward healing from true, saving faith.
Is Roman Catholicism Right About Tradition? - Part 1
Dr. W. Robert Godfrey joins Pastor Chris Gordon to examine Rome's appeal to 2 Thessalonians 2:15 and its claim to preserve unwritten apostolic tradition.
Newsletter
Our newsletter is a great way to stay up-to-date with all our latest episodes, news, and content and helps us stay in close contact with our listeners.
Subscribe
Like, subscribe and share our podcast on your favorite platform. Be sure to follow us on social media and don't forget to join our newsletter!
Donate
Support The Abounding Grace Radio Ministry
The New Reformation Catechism On Human Sexuality
by Rev. Christopher Gordon

The New Reformation Catechism on Human Sexuality, authored by Rev. Christopher Gordon, is a new biblically based catechism giving clarity on critical issues concerning human sexuality.

"May God bless you richly as you grow in Christian liberty. May this book help you hold fast to the truth and better understand how the full counsel of God speaks to the godly priority of human sexuality."
~ Rosaria Butterfield
Visit Our Store